Evaluating Arguments in Related Texts
In this activity, you will read two argumentative texts from the neoclassical era that discuss
law and government. You will evaluate the authors' use of reasoning and rhetoric in each
text. Then, you will compare the two arguments to determine which argument is more
effective.

Part A - Identify the Elements of Arguments
Now, read "Of Tyranny" by John Locke and an excerpt from The Spirit of Laws by Charles
de Secondat, known as Baron de Montesquieu. After you have read each text, complete
the table by identifying the claim, reasons, evidence, and reasoning included in each. As
you note the reasons and evidence, be sure to note at least two reasons and pieces of
evidence and include any specific rhetorical appeals or rhetorical devices the authors
use.
Finally, remember the difference between reasons and reasoning. Reasons are why readers
should agree with the claim. Reasoning is how the writer defends the claim and reasons.
Answer:

Part B - Evaluate Rhetorical Appeals and Devices
Now, read the texts again. As you read them a second time, evaluate how the authors
develop their arguments using rhetorical appeals and devices. You'll also evaluate the
validity of the claims based on the reasoning provided.