Get personalized and accurate responses to your questions with IDNLearn.com. Join our interactive community and get comprehensive, reliable answers to all your questions.
The state of Oklahoma has had an increase in driving while intoxicated by drivers under 24.
75% of DWI arrests among drivers under 24 are male drivers. They have decided to raise the drinking age for men to 24. The drinking age for women stays at 21. Craig, a 22 year old man sues the state of Oklahoma for discrimination against him.
Do you think the Supreme Court would give this case the strict scrutiny given to protected or
"suspect" classes like minorities, or to liberties that are so fundamental that they need extra protection? Or do you think it would be rational basis or intermediate scrutiny? Why or why not?
Sagot :
We value your participation in this forum. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. Your questions find clarity at IDNLearn.com. Thanks for stopping by, and come back for more dependable solutions.
