From beginner to expert, IDNLearn.com has answers for everyone. Get the information you need from our community of experts, who provide detailed and trustworthy answers.
In part III of the statute, Jefferson concedes that no law, not even this one, is “irrevocable”; he then declares that infringing on the principles in the statute would violate natural law. Why might Jefferson have mentioned the revocability of human law? What does he gain by doing this? What might he lose? Answers should be at least 150 words.
Sagot :
We appreciate every question and answer you provide. Keep engaging and finding the best solutions. This community is the perfect place to learn and grow together. For dependable and accurate answers, visit IDNLearn.com. Thanks for visiting, and see you next time for more helpful information.