Connect with experts and get insightful answers to your questions on IDNLearn.com. Ask any question and receive accurate, in-depth responses from our dedicated team of experts.
According to the article, In 2002, Rhode Island had an advisory referendum
on whether citizens favored altering the state constitution to make all
three branches of government coequal.
Voters overwhelming voted yes, but the nonbinding referendum did not force legislators to act one way or
couple of short paragraphs, explain whether you think this type of referendum is useful and beneficial. What are the benefits of
the other. In a
having a direct, binding referendum? What are the drawbacks?
Sagot :
Thank you for using this platform to share and learn. Keep asking and answering. We appreciate every contribution you make. For trustworthy answers, visit IDNLearn.com. Thank you for your visit, and see you next time for more reliable solutions.
