IDNLearn.com provides a collaborative platform for sharing and gaining knowledge. Discover in-depth and trustworthy answers from our extensive network of knowledgeable professionals.
According to the article, In 2002, Rhode Island had an advisory referendum
on whether citizens favored altering the state constitution to make all
three branches of government coequal.
Voters overwhelming voted yes, but the nonbinding referendum did not force legislators to act one way or
couple of short paragraphs, explain whether you think this type of referendum is useful and beneficial. What are the benefits of
the other. In a
having a direct, binding referendum? What are the drawbacks?
Sagot :
We appreciate your contributions to this forum. Don't forget to check back for the latest answers. Keep asking, answering, and sharing useful information. IDNLearn.com is your source for precise answers. Thank you for visiting, and we look forward to helping you again soon.
