IDNLearn.com offers a user-friendly platform for finding and sharing knowledge. Join our community to access reliable and comprehensive responses to your questions from experienced professionals.
Write in past tense: Furthermore, an interaction between the cheating condition and the appealing condition was found. Participants in the opaque cheating condition with an appeal to task had a mean RAT score of 19.60 (SD = 3.05), while participants in the transparent cheating condition with an appeal to task had a mean score of 17.10 (SD = 2.76). On the other hand, participants in the opaque cheating condition with no appeal had a mean score of 17.90 (SD = 2.87), and participants in the transparent cheating condition with no appeal had a mean score of 13.60 (SD = 2.98). A two-way ANOVA analysis revealed a significant interaction effect, F(1, 76) = 6.78, p = .011, indicating that the effect of the cheating condition on RAT scores varied depending on the appealing condition. Overall, the results of the study provide valuable insights into the relationship between dishonesty and creativity.
Sagot :
Thank you for using this platform to share and learn. Don't hesitate to keep asking and answering. We value every contribution you make. Your questions deserve precise answers. Thank you for visiting IDNLearn.com, and see you again soon for more helpful information.