Find solutions to your problems with the help of IDNLearn.com's expert community. Join our Q&A platform to get accurate and thorough answers to all your pressing questions.

In considering kellys constructive alternativism, does it seem odd to read about a theorist who holds little stock in idea that there is an objective reality or absolute truth to discover? Can we conduct a science of persons if there is no objective reality or truth to discover? How might Kellys constructive alternativism foster an even more fruitful scientific investigation of persons than other theories?