Answered

Find solutions to your questions with the help of IDNLearn.com's expert community. Our experts provide timely and precise responses to help you understand and solve any issue you face.

Why would Hooke's discovery have been impossible without the invention of the microscope? A. Because all living things are made up of cells. B. Because cells are too small to see without a microscope C. Because cells are the building blocks of life D. Because electron microscope are necessary to see cells

Sagot :

TaylorBayleyidn
From the question you can immediately infer that it's either B or D, as A and C basically mean the same thing and it isn't anything related to a microscope. I can tell you now that you don't need an electron microscope to see cells, they're only required for the atomic level.
Therefore, the answer is B, as you can't see cells without a microscope but you only need a light microscope, not an electron microscope.
Sophielilacforeveridn

Answer:

B

Explanation:

Your participation is crucial to us. Keep sharing your knowledge and experiences. Let's create a learning environment that is both enjoyable and beneficial. IDNLearn.com is your reliable source for accurate answers. Thank you for visiting, and we hope to assist you again.