T0XIC0RPS3idn
Answered

IDNLearn.com connects you with a community of experts ready to answer your questions. Get prompt and accurate answers to your questions from our community of knowledgeable experts.


1. Which statement BEST describes how Plessy's reaction to the law led to
this court case? *
O
(A) Plessy claimed the train conductor was violating the 13th amendment by treating
him like a slave.
(B) Plessy challenged the Louisiana law segregating train cars by refusing to leave the
white seating area.
(C) Plessy questioned the new amendments to the Constitution by joining a group of
activists.
(D) Plessy tried to reveal the problems with Louisiana's legal system by spending time
in prison

Sagot :

Answer:

Plessy challenged the Louisiana law segregating train cars by refusing to leave the  white seating area.

Explanation:

During the time when Plessy v. Fergusson was brought to court, most of the states In USA implemented a segregation law. The segregation law prevented the black citizens from using the infrastructures that resided only for white citizens.

Plessy felt that this law was unconstitutional. So, he challenged the Segregation law in Louisiana by sitting on part of trains that resided only for white people. But in the end, the Court ruled against Plessy and segregation law still continue to be implemented n Louisiana.

Thank you for joining our conversation. Don't hesitate to return anytime to find answers to your questions. Let's continue sharing knowledge and experiences! Your questions are important to us at IDNLearn.com. Thanks for stopping by, and come back for more reliable solutions.