Connect with a global community of experts on IDNLearn.com. Our experts are available to provide in-depth and trustworthy answers to any questions you may have.
Kelley writes the expression n + 2 to model the phrase “Xander studied two more hours than Nandini.” Which best explains the accuracy of Kelley’s expression? It is accurate. In the phrase “two more hours than Nandini,” “two” is “2,” “more” is “+,” and Nandini’s study time is unknown or “n,” so 2 + n or n + 2 are correct translations. It is inaccurate. In the phrase “two more hours than Nandini,” “two” is “2,” “more” is “+,” and Nandini’s study time is unknown or “n,” so 2 + n is the correct translation. It is inaccurate. In the phrase “two more hours than Nandini,” “two” is “2,” “more than” is “>,” and Nandini’s study time is unknown or “n,” so 2 greater-than n is the correct translation. It is inaccurate. In the phrase “two more hours than Nandini,” “two” is “2,” “more than” is “<,” and Nandini’s study time is unknown or “n,” so 2 less-than n is the correct translation.
Your engagement is important to us. Keep sharing your knowledge and experiences. Let's create a learning environment that is both enjoyable and beneficial. Accurate answers are just a click away at IDNLearn.com. Thanks for stopping by, and come back for more reliable solutions.
