Answered

Get the answers you've been searching for with IDNLearn.com. Get the information you need from our community of experts who provide accurate and thorough answers to all your questions.

Suppose that instead of an out-of-uniform police officer and his son being in the parking lot when the teenagers arrived. Sally, a parking attendant hired by the store, was in the parking lot being picked up by her daughter. When Sally asked the teenagers to quiet down they assaulted her. Sally's daughter dashed into the store to request that the clerk call the police. The clerk refused and would not let the daughter use the store phone to place the call herself. The daughter then went back out to the parking lot and asked a store customer to call the police using his cell phone. The customer also refused to help. Sally sued the store and the customer
1. Under these facts
2. In her suit against the store the Sally can cite
3. Sally stands in a special relationship to the store customer because
4. Sally is most likely to win her suit against

Sagot :

Annykslidn

Answer and Explanation:

1. Given these facts, we can conclude that the store, represented by its employee, did not take responsibility for something that happened in its establishment, even refusing to promote aid to a victim who was a store employee.

2. She can quote Carey v Davis, where Carey, after passing out from sunstroke, did not receive due help from his boss Frank Davis, who dragged him out and left him in the sun, who caused several injuries to his body.

3. She does not have any relationship with the store's customer, who, she did not even know and had no proximity to.

4. She can win the lawsuit against the store, which has proved irresponsible and inhuman.

We value your presence here. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. This community is the perfect place to learn together. Find clear answers at IDNLearn.com. Thanks for stopping by, and come back for more reliable solutions.