Answered

IDNLearn.com provides a collaborative environment for finding accurate answers. Get accurate and detailed answers to your questions from our knowledgeable and dedicated community members.

Refer to the Newsela article "The Relationship between Hunger and War."

What is the author's viewpoint in the article?

• Destroying food resources is more damaging than the use of weapons.

•Humanitarian aid is the solution to ending food insecurity.

•By ending wars, nations can eliminate famine.

•The United Nations has done little to address the use of starvation as a weapon.

Sagot :

Parrainidn

Answer: Destroying food resources is more damaging than the use of weapons.

Explanation:

In the aforementioned article, the author explains how using starvation and food insecurity as weapons of war by destroying food resources, can be more damaging than the use of weapons.

Destroying food resources can threaten entire populations as they may starve to death while weapons cannot regularly do so. For instance, Germany could have implemented food destruction policies in WWII that would have killed 20 million Russians and the starvation of Biafra by the Nigerian government during the Biafran war killed many times more Biafrans by the armed conflict did.

Camelita101idn

Answer: Destroying food resources is more damaging than the use of weapons.

Explanation:

i took the test

Thank you for being part of this discussion. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. Discover the answers you need at IDNLearn.com. Thanks for visiting, and come back soon for more valuable insights.