IDNLearn.com makes it easy to find accurate answers to your questions. Find accurate and detailed answers to your questions from our experienced and dedicated community members.

Daily moral dilemma:
A woman was on her deathbed. There was one drug that the doctors thought might save her. It was a form of radium that a druggist in the same town had recently discovered. The drug was expensive to make, but the druggist was charging ten times what the drug cost him to produce. He paid $200 for the radium and charged $2,000 for a small dose of the drug. The sick woman's husband, Heinz, went to everyone he knew to borrow the money, but he could only get together about $1,000 which is half of what it cost. He told the druggist that his wife was dying and asked him to sell it cheaper or let him pay later. But the druggist said: “No, I discovered the drug and I'm going to make money from it.” So Heinz got desperate and broke into the man's laboratory to steal the drug for his wife. Should Heinz have broken into the laboratory to steal the drug for his wife? Why or why not?


Sagot :

to be honest this is more of a personal thing, as in anyones answer can be diffrent, but my answer would me yes, he moraly shouldent have, but for the sake of his wife he did it anyways. It would be diffrent if he was just doing it for himself, as in to steal money, but he did it for someone who ment a lot to him, and that alone means a lot, so i personaly think he was right to do so (and that doctor kinda sucks).

Answer:

No because he will be charged more to go to jail then to buy the drug.

We greatly appreciate every question and answer you provide. Keep engaging and finding the best solutions. This community is the perfect place to learn and grow together. Discover insightful answers at IDNLearn.com. We appreciate your visit and look forward to assisting you again.