Solve your doubts and expand your knowledge with IDNLearn.com's extensive Q&A database. Ask any question and receive comprehensive, well-informed responses from our dedicated team of experts.
Sagot :
Answer:
Sentence 3
sentence one is not a fallacy, it is an opinion that can be supported by evidence.
sentence two is not a fallacy. the banning of books goes against U.S. amendment one, which includes Freedom of Religion, Speech, Press, Assembly, and Petition.
sentence three is a fallacy. there is no evidence that would support this claim and there is no logical reasoning behind it.
sentence four is not a fallacy. It is a rhetorical question coupled with a true fact.
e2021

Sentence one isn't a misrepresentation, an assessment can be upheld by proof. Sentence two isn't a misrepresentation.
What are the justifications for why books are prohibited?
The books are restricted as they would show a figure of separation among the orientation, position, or race.The thoughts communicated in the books can sting any of the local area in the general public.
The book notices such words or expressions that can be hostile in the public eye while reading.The books can make reference to such a tone of discourse that can't be perceived by any of the readers.The thoughts referenced in the books don't line up with the qualities.
Consequently, the writer composed this extract to illuminate that there are different risky thoughts that an author can specify in their books however they are not appropriate for society.
For more information about sentence, refer the following link:
https://brainly.com/question/18728726
#SPJ2
We appreciate your contributions to this forum. Don't forget to check back for the latest answers. Keep asking, answering, and sharing useful information. IDNLearn.com has the answers you need. Thank you for visiting, and we look forward to helping you again soon.