Connect with a community of experts and enthusiasts on IDNLearn.com. Discover trustworthy solutions to your questions quickly and accurately with help from our dedicated community of experts.
Sagot :
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
From the information given:
let [tex]\mu_1[/tex] be the men of the population 1 (Raymondville) and [tex]\mu_2[/tex] be the mean of the population 2 (Rosenberg).
Here the Restaurateur wants to prove that Raymondville residents dine out more often than Rosenberg residents.
i.e [tex]\mu_1 > \mu _2[/tex]
The null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis:
[tex]H_o : \mu_1 \le \mu_2 \\ \\ H_a: \mu_1 > \mu_2[/tex]
[tex]H_o : \mu_1 \le \mu_2\ \ vs \ \ H_a: \mu_1 > \mu_2 \implies \text{upper tailed test}[/tex]
The shows that this test is one-tailed with the rejection area on the right side.
The appropriate decision: is to reject [tex]\mathbf{H_o}[/tex] if the test statistics is greater than the critical value)
Thank you for being part of this discussion. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. IDNLearn.com is your go-to source for dependable answers. Thank you for visiting, and we hope to assist you again.