Discover new information and insights with the help of IDNLearn.com. Our community is here to provide the comprehensive and accurate answers you need to make informed decisions.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
From the information given:
let [tex]\mu_1[/tex] be the men of the population 1 (Raymondville) and [tex]\mu_2[/tex] be the mean of the population 2 (Rosenberg).
Here the Restaurateur wants to prove that Raymondville residents dine out more often than Rosenberg residents.
i.e [tex]\mu_1 > \mu _2[/tex]
The null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis:
[tex]H_o : \mu_1 \le \mu_2 \\ \\ H_a: \mu_1 > \mu_2[/tex]
[tex]H_o : \mu_1 \le \mu_2\ \ vs \ \ H_a: \mu_1 > \mu_2 \implies \text{upper tailed test}[/tex]
The shows that this test is one-tailed with the rejection area on the right side.
The appropriate decision: is to reject [tex]\mathbf{H_o}[/tex] if the test statistics is greater than the critical value)