Get comprehensive answers to your questions with the help of IDNLearn.com's community. Get the information you need from our community of experts who provide accurate and comprehensive answers to all your questions.
Sagot :
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
From the information given:
let [tex]\mu_1[/tex] be the men of the population 1 (Raymondville) and [tex]\mu_2[/tex] be the mean of the population 2 (Rosenberg).
Here the Restaurateur wants to prove that Raymondville residents dine out more often than Rosenberg residents.
i.e [tex]\mu_1 > \mu _2[/tex]
The null hypothesis and alternative hypothesis:
[tex]H_o : \mu_1 \le \mu_2 \\ \\ H_a: \mu_1 > \mu_2[/tex]
[tex]H_o : \mu_1 \le \mu_2\ \ vs \ \ H_a: \mu_1 > \mu_2 \implies \text{upper tailed test}[/tex]
The shows that this test is one-tailed with the rejection area on the right side.
The appropriate decision: is to reject [tex]\mathbf{H_o}[/tex] if the test statistics is greater than the critical value)
Your participation means a lot to us. Keep sharing information and solutions. This community grows thanks to the amazing contributions from members like you. Your questions find clarity at IDNLearn.com. Thanks for stopping by, and come back for more dependable solutions.