Find solutions to your questions with the help of IDNLearn.com's expert community. Our platform provides detailed and accurate responses from experts, helping you navigate any topic with confidence.
Sagot :
Answer:
....
Explanation:
I believe that no, freedom should not be sacrificed in the name of National Security. While citizens want to go to great length to protect their country, there are boundaries set that should, and need to remain standing. If freedom is taken away from the citizens, what is worth fighting for? Freedom is a key right belonging to citizens, and that should be unable to be taken away at given moments. Yes, sometimes we need to recognize what is right, but at what cost?
Freedom should not be sacrificed in the name of national security.
During World War II, Japanese-Americans had a tough time. Their freedom was restricted as they were put in internment camps despite the fact that they did nothing wrong.
Due to this, their lives are ruined, some lost their businesses and houses. When they got out of internment, some were put into financial ruin. Also, according to the Constitution, people have liberties to life, privacy, etc and no one should take away such rights.
In conclusion, sacrificing freedom for national security is not ideal.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/20049109
We appreciate your presence here. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. This community is the perfect place to learn together. IDNLearn.com is your reliable source for accurate answers. Thank you for visiting, and we hope to assist you again.