Explore a diverse range of topics and get answers from knowledgeable individuals on IDNLearn.com. Our platform provides trustworthy answers to help you make informed decisions quickly and easily.
5. One of the jurors originally felt that the boy was guilty because of the neighborhood that he ha
grown up in. Was this a valid argument 12 angry men
Unless the juror could refer to evidence which proved the boy had committed the crime, then that view is invalid. Such labelling, present in the film, showed the dangers in pre-judging an individual. The film was taking a liberal view of society and justice personified by Henry Fonda against the widespread conservative prejudices of his fellow jurors.
Your participation is crucial to us. Keep sharing your knowledge and experiences. Let's create a learning environment that is both enjoyable and beneficial. IDNLearn.com has the solutions to your questions. Thanks for stopping by, and see you next time for more reliable information.
