Answered

At IDNLearn.com, find answers to your most pressing questions from experts and enthusiasts alike. Join our interactive community and access reliable, detailed answers from experienced professionals across a variety of topics.

JUUL claimed that their product helped people quit smoking, even though there was no independent research to back that up. This is an example of...

Sagot :

Crysstalrose1512idn
This is an example of liability

JUUL is an example of Strict Products Liability as it is not good for fitness and may cause several health issues.

  1. Arguments associated with the faulty nature of JUUL include: JUUL Labs did not well warn customers of the dangers of the use of JUUL products.
  2. The business enterprise did not offer ok commands for secure use of the products, and. While the long-time period aspect results of vaping are not nicely-known.

Why Juul should not be consumed?

Juul and different e-cigarettes were related to severe fitness problems, which include excessive lung injuries, seizures, nicotine dependency, poisoning, and improved danger of coronary heart assaults and strokes.

Thus it is clear that Juul is an example of  Strict Products Liability.

To learn more about the JUUL  refer to the link :

https://brainly.com/question/13503697

We value your participation in this forum. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. Your search for answers ends at IDNLearn.com. Thank you for visiting, and we hope to assist you again soon.