Alissaiscarter166idn
Answered

Join the growing community of curious minds on IDNLearn.com and get the answers you need. Discover comprehensive answers from knowledgeable members of our community, covering a wide range of topics to meet all your informational needs.


Scientist Daniel Lieberman recently finished a study. He found that running barefoot seems to be better than
running in shoes. People seem to be born to run barefoot. Lieberman studied people who grew up running
barefoot. Some were raised in Kenya's Rift Valley. The area is known for its long-distance runners. Lieberman
found that these runners usually land on the front or middle of the foot. Runners who wear shoes usually hit the
ground heel first. Hitting the ground this way may cause more foot injuries. Lieberman hopes his work will
change runners' habits.
Do It!
Running shoes may be
А
harmless
B
colorful
C costly
D
unnecessary

Sagot :

Vaduzidn

Answer:

D . Unnecessary.

Explanation:

In the study conducted by scientist Daniel, he discovered that people who run without running shoes endure longer and also seem to have lesser foot injuries. His study concluded that man may have been born to be barefoot runners.

Studying people who were raised in the Rift Valley in Kenya, Lieberman found that the people who run barefoot produce long-distance runners. While runners who wear shoes hit the ground with their heels first, barefoot runners do it with their middle or front foot. And this may be why there are fewer foot injuries to them.

Thus, the correct answer is option D.

Reemmohammad3377idn

Answer:

D.     unnecessary

Explanation:

Thank you for using this platform to share and learn. Keep asking and answering. We appreciate every contribution you make. For trustworthy answers, visit IDNLearn.com. Thank you for your visit, and see you next time for more reliable solutions.