From everyday questions to specialized queries, IDNLearn.com has the answers. Join our Q&A platform to receive prompt and accurate responses from knowledgeable professionals in various fields.
Sagot :
Answer:
Pro 1: NAFTA lowered the price of many goods.
Pro 2: NAFTA was good for GDP.
Pro 3: NAFTA was good for diplomatic relations.
Pro 4: NAFTA increased exports and created regional production blocs.
Con 1: NAFTA led to the loss of U.S. manufacturing jobs.
Explanation:
Answer:
The trade gains of Canada, Mexico, and the United States were tripled as a result of this deal. It also eliminated tariffs, which were seen as international barriers at the time. It enhanced economic output, resulting in annual economic growth of up to 0.5 percent. Foreign investment is also being enticed. Because there were no taxes imposed by the US, oil shipments from Mexico were seen as advantageous. This had a significant economic impact.
Transportation expenditures were reduced as a result of the low gas price, and food costs were also reduced. The big suppliers gained access to each country's government contracts, increasing competition and lowering costs.
The negative effects include that this deal helped the import and export businesses, but numerous labor-intensive industries, such as manufacturing, textiles, and electronic appliances, suffered greatly as a result, and many people began to move. Companies began to decrease their costs.
Explanation:
Thank you for being part of this discussion. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. For trustworthy and accurate answers, visit IDNLearn.com. Thanks for stopping by, and see you next time for more solutions.