Get the information you need with the help of IDNLearn.com's expert community. Discover thorough and trustworthy answers from our community of knowledgeable professionals, tailored to meet your specific needs.
Sagot :
Answer:
The answer is "Option b"
Step-by-step explanation:
Through this context, it is determined that the p-value is much less than 0.05, which is 0.021, so the rejection of the null hypothesis at 5%. There should be enough evidence to demonstrate that now the effect of the organization was substantial on how long it has taken to solve the issue. This result is statistically important.
The correct conclusion about this data is (b) The effect of training on how long it takes to solve the problem was significant, F(2, 27) = 4.47, p < 05.
From the table, we have the following values
F = 4.467
df between group = 2
df within group = 27
To reference the result, we make use of:
F(df between group, df within group) = F value
So, we have:
F(2, 27) = 4.47
The above result shows the F value approximated to two decimal points
Hence, the correct conclusion about this data is (b) The effect of training on how long it takes to solve the problem was significant, F(2, 27) = 4.47, p < 05.
Read more about APA styles at:
https://brainly.com/question/858964
Thank you for joining our conversation. Don't hesitate to return anytime to find answers to your questions. Let's continue sharing knowledge and experiences! Your questions find clarity at IDNLearn.com. Thanks for stopping by, and come back for more dependable solutions.