Answered

Get comprehensive solutions to your problems with IDNLearn.com. Discover in-depth and reliable answers to all your questions from our knowledgeable community members who are always ready to assist.

June enters into a contract with Steeley Company to purchase a washer and dryer. She doesn’t understand the financing terms but signs the agreement anyway because she needs the appliances. The financing terms violate state laws on interest rate limits and she is unable to make all of her payments when they are due. Steeley sues when June breaches the contract. The court would:

Sagot :

Answer: be exercising judicial restraint if it requires June to pay as she promised, even if the agreement was unfair and unwise.

Explanation:

Judicial restraint simply means a situation whereby judges aren't allowed to inject their own preferences into rulings and legal proceedings. It simply means that judges should limit exercising their own power during legal proceedings.

In this case, since June doesn't understand the contract but still signed, the court would be exercising judicial restraint if it requires June to pay as she promised, even if the agreement was unfair and unwise. It's advisable for the court not to interfere in the matter and follow the normal proceedings.

Thank you for using this platform to share and learn. Don't hesitate to keep asking and answering. We value every contribution you make. IDNLearn.com provides the best answers to your questions. Thank you for visiting, and come back soon for more helpful information.