Answered

Find expert answers and community insights on IDNLearn.com. Our experts are available to provide accurate, comprehensive answers to help you make informed decisions about any topic or issue you encounter.

June enters into a contract with Steeley Company to purchase a washer and dryer. She doesn’t understand the financing terms but signs the agreement anyway because she needs the appliances. The financing terms violate state laws on interest rate limits and she is unable to make all of her payments when they are due. Steeley sues when June breaches the contract. The court would:

Sagot :

Answer: be exercising judicial restraint if it requires June to pay as she promised, even if the agreement was unfair and unwise.

Explanation:

Judicial restraint simply means a situation whereby judges aren't allowed to inject their own preferences into rulings and legal proceedings. It simply means that judges should limit exercising their own power during legal proceedings.

In this case, since June doesn't understand the contract but still signed, the court would be exercising judicial restraint if it requires June to pay as she promised, even if the agreement was unfair and unwise. It's advisable for the court not to interfere in the matter and follow the normal proceedings.

Your presence in our community is highly appreciated. Keep sharing your insights and solutions. Together, we can build a rich and valuable knowledge resource for everyone. IDNLearn.com has the solutions you’re looking for. Thanks for visiting, and see you next time for more reliable information.