IDNLearn.com offers a seamless experience for finding and sharing knowledge. Our experts provide accurate and detailed responses to help you navigate any topic or issue with confidence.
Sagot :
Answer: c. can be voided based upon fraud in the inducement .
Explanation:
Brad knew exactly what kind of stone it was that Andrew had and yet proceeded to lie about it in order to induce a sale at a much lower price than the actual worth of the jewel .
The contract is therefore voidable because the Brad committed fraud by lying and obtaining the diamond at $50 under false pretenses. Andrew should therefore drag him to the Courts of law to face justice.
Thank you for using this platform to share and learn. Keep asking and answering. We appreciate every contribution you make. IDNLearn.com is dedicated to providing accurate answers. Thank you for visiting, and see you next time for more solutions.