Answered

Join the growing community of curious minds on IDNLearn.com and get the answers you need. Whether it's a simple query or a complex problem, our experts have the answers you need.

Negating conditional statement (a V ~ b) => c

Please show your work and give a proper answer

Negating Conditional Statement A V B Gt C Please Show Your Work And Give A Proper Answer class=

Sagot :

LammettHashidn

"p implies q" is equivalent to "(p and q) or not p", which in turn is equivalent to "(p or not p) and (q or not p)". But "p or not p" is always true, so the implication reduces completely to "not p or q". Negating an implication thus gives "not (not p or q)", which is equivalent to "p and not q".

So

not [(a or not b) implies c]   <==>  (a or not b) and not c

Thank you for participating in our discussion. We value every contribution. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. Let's create a dynamic and informative learning environment together. Thank you for choosing IDNLearn.com. We’re dedicated to providing clear answers, so visit us again for more solutions.