IDNLearn.com provides a platform for sharing and gaining valuable knowledge. Get accurate answers to your questions from our community of experts who are always ready to provide timely and relevant solutions.
Sagot :
Answer: Difficult, but I choose C: His conclusion is based on an assertion regarding unfairness, and unfairness is a very subjective concept.
Explanation: The ineffectiveness in Antoine's argument is, in my mind, that he is ignoring the purpose of the gasoline tax increase. The purpose is to limit petroleum consumption, not to increase revenues. The increased revenue, in fact, could be used to lower taxes. While his argument does seem to address fairness, that doesn't apply here. In fact, it would be unfair to add taxes to people who don't consume much petroleum. Furthermore, his plan would do nothing to direcly reduce petroleum consumption. Choice C came closest to this line of thought.
Thank you for participating in our discussion. We value every contribution. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. Let's create a dynamic and informative learning environment together. Find clear and concise answers at IDNLearn.com. Thanks for stopping by, and come back for more dependable solutions.