Zachman20161idn
Answered

Join IDNLearn.com and become part of a knowledge-sharing community that thrives on curiosity. Our experts provide prompt and accurate answers to help you make informed decisions on any topic.

Which three statements accurately describe Munn v. Illinois?

It was a case that came to the Supreme Court because of pressure from the Grange.
It ruled that farmers could determine the price for storing their grain until they were ready to sell it.
It ruled that states rather than owners of grain elevators could set the maximum price for storing grain.
It led to a commission to make sure its provisions were enforced.
It is an example of how a protest group convinced a government to become involved in regulation.

Sagot :

Ogorwyneidn

The three statements that accurately describe Munn v Illinois are:

  • It was a case that came to the Supreme Court because of pressure from the Grange.
  • It ruled that states rather than owners of grain elevators could set the maximum price for storing grain.
  • It is an example of how a protest group convinced a government to become involved in regulation.

The Munn v. Illinois case was case that developed through pressure from the Grange. The Grange were an association of farmers.

The presiding judge over the case ruled that the states had the power to regulate private businesses as long as the businesses affected the public.

Due to the fact that the storage facilities for keeping the grains were for the use of the general public, the states could regulate their rates.

Therefore the case gives us a clear example of how a protest could get the government involved in a regulation.

Read more on https://brainly.com/question/11546522?referrer=searchResults

Answer:

The three statements that accurately describe Munn v Illinois are:

It was a case that came to the Supreme Court because of pressure from the Grange.

It ruled that states rather than owners of grain elevators could set the maximum price for storing grain.

It is an example of how a protest group convinced a government to become involved in regulation.

The Munn v. Illinois case was case that developed through pressure from the Grange. The Grange were an association of farmers.

The presiding judge over the case ruled that the states had the power to regulate private businesses as long as the businesses affected the public.

Due to the fact that the storage facilities for keeping the grains were for the use of the general public, the states could regulate their rates.

Explanation:

We are delighted to have you as part of our community. Keep asking, answering, and sharing your insights. Together, we can create a valuable knowledge resource. IDNLearn.com is committed to providing accurate answers. Thanks for stopping by, and see you next time for more solutions.