Using linear functions, it is found that the sales price in Port Townsend is never double the Seattle price.
A linear function has the following format:
[tex]y = mx + b[/tex]
In which:
- m is the slope, which is the rate of change.
- b is the y-intercept, which is the initial value.
For Seattle:
- Initial value of $38,000 in 1970, thus the y-intercept is [tex]b = 38000[/tex].
- Increased by $137,000 in 20 years, thus the slope is:
[tex]m = \frac{137000}{20} = 6850[/tex]
Thus, the sales prince in n years after 1970 for Seattle is:
[tex]S(n) = 38000 + 6850n[/tex]
For Port Townsend:
- Initial value of $8,400 in 1970, thus the y-intercept is [tex]b = 8400[/tex].
- Increased by $160,000 in 20 years, thus the slope is:
[tex]m = \frac{160000}{20} = 8000[/tex]
Thus, the sales prince in n years after 1970 for Port Townsend is:
[tex]P(n) = 8400 + 8000n[/tex]
Port Townsend is double Seattle in n years after 1970, for which:
[tex]P(n) = 2S(n)[/tex]
Then
[tex]8400 + 8000n = 2(38000 + 6850n)[/tex]
[tex]8400 + 8000n = 76000 + 13700n[/tex]
[tex]7500n = -67600[/tex]
Negative number, and we are working only with positive, thus, it is found that the sales price in Port Townsend is never double the Seattle price.
A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/23861861