Get expert advice and community support on IDNLearn.com. Discover in-depth answers to your questions from our community of experienced professionals.
(PLEASE HELP )Read the passage below. Highlight the concerns of the plaintiff. Then answer the question to the right.
Recently, the Supreme Court of the United States reversed a lower court ruling that allowed a company to patent DNA sequences for two cancer genes. The patent prevents other scientists from using these DNA sequences for any reason. The company uses the DNA sequences to market kits used to identify the two types of cancer in humans. The company claims that the gene sequences are its intellectual property. it's owner feels that allowing other people to access the sequences will harm his company financially because the search for the gene sequences was very expensive.but the plaintiff in the case argue that Gene sequences are products of nature that cannot legally be patterned the plaintiff explain to the judge that the kids are very expensive as a result some patients who need these tests cannot afford to have them done.
Thank you for participating in our discussion. We value every contribution. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. Let's create a dynamic and informative learning environment together. Thank you for choosing IDNLearn.com. We’re committed to providing accurate answers, so visit us again soon.