Find the best answers to your questions with the help of IDNLearn.com's knowledgeable users. Get step-by-step guidance for all your technical questions from our knowledgeable community members.
Sagot :
The client suffered an unwarranted police invasion and this is outrageous because it disobeys the Fourth Constitutional Amendment.
We can reach this conclusion because:
- The defense attorney could claim that the home invasion without filing a search warrant violates the Fourth Constitutional Amendment.
- This amendment states that no search or seizure of evidence of a crime can be carried out in the suspects' homes, without a search and seizure warrant being presented.
- In this case, the lawyer could claim that the police violated a client's citizen's right by breaking into and searching the house for drugs.
While this is true, there are some cases where the Fourth Amendment can be ignored and law enforcement officers can break into homes looking for evidence of serious crimes, such as drug trafficking, for example.
Therefore, even using this fourth amendment to defend the client, he could not claim that the police acted incorrectly.
More information:
https://brainly.com/question/15026474?referrer=searchResults
Your presence in our community is highly appreciated. Keep sharing your insights and solutions. Together, we can build a rich and valuable knowledge resource for everyone. Thank you for choosing IDNLearn.com. We’re committed to providing accurate answers, so visit us again soon.