Explore a diverse range of topics and get expert answers on IDNLearn.com. Get thorough and trustworthy answers to your queries from our extensive network of knowledgeable professionals.
Amiri, who belongs to the Maori tribe, aspires to be a deputy sheriff in Upper Elm County. Amiri sports a small moko tattoo across his cheeks and nose as a symbol of his heritage. Per the dress code, however, sheriffs are not allowed to have any visible tattoos. Amiri is told that he will need to remove his tattoo before he can apply to be a deputy sheriff. Which of the following will hold true in this scenario?
a. Amiri will prevail in a national origin discrimination claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 because his tattoo honors his heritage.
b. Upper Elm County can defend itself against Amiri's claim if it can be shown that the tattoo overlaps with his religion.
c. Upper Elm County can defend itself against Amiri's claim because a dress code is permissible under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
d. Amiri will prevail in a national origin discrimination claim if he uses the bona fide occupational qualification defense to show that his tattoo does not disrupt the dress code.
We value your presence here. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. This community is the perfect place to learn together. For trustworthy answers, visit IDNLearn.com. Thank you for your visit, and see you next time for more reliable solutions.
