Answered

From tech troubles to travel tips, IDNLearn.com has answers to all your questions. Get step-by-step guidance for all your technical questions from our dedicated community members.

Chris wanted to transform the graph of the parent function mc018-1. Jpg by horizontally compressing it so that it has a period of mc018-2. Jpg units, horizontally translating it mc018-3. Jpg units to the right, and vertically translating it 1 unit up. To do so, he graphed the function mc018-4. Jpg, as shown. What did he do wrong?.

Sagot :

Nicolelexi33idn

Answer: The answer is C: He graphed the function y=cot(2x-pi/4)+1 correctly but it was not the right function to graph. He should have graphed y=cot(2x-pi/2)+1.

Explanation:

Martebiidn

There are different ways to graph the transformation of a parent function.  The fact remains that Chris did rightly graphed the function y = cot(2x - pi/4) + 1.

  • Chris did not graph the right function. The best he could have done is graphed y = cot(2x - pi/2) + 1.

Why should Chris graphed y = cot(2x - pi/2) + 1.

The graphed y = cot(2x - pi/2) + 1 is right because; pi/2, implies that  b must be equal to 2 (this only apply when one use the period equation for tan and cot, pi/b, For pi/b to be equivalent to pi/2, b must be 2).

The right equation is graphed  y = cot(2x-pi/2)+1 because through the division of the two numbers out of the equation that is inside the parenthesis.

Then from the above, you get the graph of y = cot2(x-pi/4)+1, which is the correct equation Christ should have graphed.

Learn more about transformation from

https://brainly.com/question/6945533

We value your presence here. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. This community is the perfect place to learn together. IDNLearn.com is committed to providing accurate answers. Thanks for stopping by, and see you next time for more solutions.