Find solutions to your problems with the help of IDNLearn.com's expert community. Discover the information you need from our experienced professionals who provide accurate and reliable answers to all your questions.
Sagot :
Testing the hypothesis using the z-distribution, it is found that since the p-value of the test is of 0.0262 < 0.05, it can be concluded that the new booklet is effective.
At the null hypothesis, we test if there has been no improvement, that is, the time is still of 3 hours. Hence:
[tex]H_0: \mu = 3[/tex]
At the alternative hypothesis, we test if there has been improvement, that is, the time is of less than 3 hours. Thus:
[tex]H_1: \mu < 3[/tex]
We have the standard deviation for the population, thus, the z-distribution is used. The test statistic is given by:
[tex]z = \frac{\overline{x} - \mu}{\frac{\sigma}{\sqrt{n}}}[/tex]
The parameters are:
- [tex]\overline{x}[/tex] is the sample mean.
- [tex]\mu[/tex] is the value tested at the null hypothesis.
- [tex]\sigma[/tex] is the standard deviation of the population.
- n is the sample size.
In this problem, the values of the parameters are: [tex]\mu = 3, \sigma = 0.2, \overline{x} = 2.9, n = 15[/tex].
Then, the value of the test statistic is:
[tex]z = \frac{2.9 - 3}{\frac{0.2}{\sqrt{15}}}[/tex]
[tex]z = -1.94[/tex]
The p-value of the test is the probability of finding a sample mean of 2.9 hours or less, which is the p-value of z = -1.94.
Looking at the z-table, z = -1.94 has a p-value of 0.0262.
Since the p-value of the test is of 0.0262 < 0.05, it can be concluded that the new booklet is effective.
A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/25413422
Thank you for using this platform to share and learn. Don't hesitate to keep asking and answering. We value every contribution you make. IDNLearn.com is your go-to source for dependable answers. Thank you for visiting, and we hope to assist you again.