Discover a wealth of information and get your questions answered on IDNLearn.com. Discover in-depth and reliable answers to all your questions from our knowledgeable community members who are always ready to assist.
Sagot :
Explanation:
(a) Direct Labor Rate Variance:
Direct Labor Cost Variance is the difference between the actual direct labor cost, and the standard cost.
The formula for calculating the direct labor cost variance is:
Actual cost per DLH = (Actual) direct labor cost incurred / Actual amount of direct labor hours.
Actual cost per DLH = $360,000/20,000 = $18 per DLH
Direct Labor Cost Variance = [Actual Cost (AC) - Standard Cost (SC)] × Actual quantity of labor hours (AQ).
Direct Labor Cost Variance = ($18 per DLH - $16.50 per DLH) × 20,000 hours
Direct Labor Cost Variance = $1.50 × 20,000 hours
Direct Labor Cost Variance = $30,000 ( U )
The direct labor cost variance is unfavorable because because the firm paid $1.50 more per hour than expected ($18 actual cost - $16.50 standard cost).
(b) Labor Efficiency Variance:
Direct Labor Efficiency Variance: The difference between the actual quantity of labor hours and the labor hours that should have been used (standard quantity).
Direct Labor Efficiency Variance = (AQ − SQ) × SC
We must determine the standard quantity of labor hours before we could solve for the direct labor efficiency variance.
SQ = 45,000 units × 0.5 hours = 22,500 total DLH
Substitute the SQ into the calculations for the direct labor efficiency variance:
Direct Labor Efficiency Variance = (20,000 DLH - 22,500 DLH) × $16.50 per DLH
Direct Labor Efficiency Variance = $41,250 ( F )
The $41,250 direct labor efficiency variance is favorable because the employees worked 2,500 fewer hours than the flexible budget called for to produce 45,000 units.
(c) Total Direct Labor Cost Variance:
Total Direct Labor Cost Variance = Cost Variance - Efficiency Variance
Total Direct Labor Cost Variance = $30,000 ( U ) - $41,250 ( F )
Total Direct Labor Cost Variance = $11,250 ( F )
The $11,250 favorable direct labor variance suggests that total labor costs were significantly less than expectations. The reasons are:
- The employees produced 45,000 units in 20,000 hours instead of the expected 22,500 hours—hence, a favorable efficiency variance.
- The firm also paid its workers an average of $18 per labor hour instead of the standard rate of $16.50—thus, an unfavorable cost variance.
*Note:
This will be the last time that I'll help out with a non-math related topic.
Thank you for being part of this discussion. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. IDNLearn.com is dedicated to providing accurate answers. Thank you for visiting, and see you next time for more solutions.