From simple questions to complex issues, IDNLearn.com has the answers you need. Ask anything and receive well-informed answers from our community of experienced professionals.
Sarah and Charlie both investigated the properties of rocks they found while on a walk. Take a look at the table with their observations. What was the difference between the two sets of observations?
Sarah's Observations Charlie's Observations
The mineral was metallic. The mineral was non-metallic.
The mineral had cleavage. The mineral did not have cleavage.
The mineral was red. The mineral was red.
The mineral had luster. The mineral had luster.
a Sarah observed that the mineral was metallic and red.
b Charlie observed that the mineral was red and had luster.
c Sarah observed the mineral had cleavage and was metallic.
d Charlie observed the mineral was non-metallic and had luster.
Answer: C. Sarah observed the mineral had cleavage and was metallic.
Explanation: The answer is C because the question is asking about the difference in their observations. Sarah claimed the mineral had cleavage and was metallic, while Charlie said the opposite.
We appreciate your participation in this forum. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. Thank you for choosing IDNLearn.com. We’re committed to providing accurate answers, so visit us again soon.
