Find expert answers and community-driven knowledge on IDNLearn.com. Ask your questions and receive reliable and comprehensive answers from our dedicated community of professionals.
Sarah and Charlie both investigated the properties of rocks they found while on a walk. Take a look at the table with their observations. What was the difference between the two sets of observations?
Sarah's Observations Charlie's Observations
The mineral was metallic. The mineral was non-metallic.
The mineral had cleavage. The mineral did not have cleavage.
The mineral was red. The mineral was red.
The mineral had luster. The mineral had luster.
a Sarah observed that the mineral was metallic and red.
b Charlie observed that the mineral was red and had luster.
c Sarah observed the mineral had cleavage and was metallic.
d Charlie observed the mineral was non-metallic and had luster.
Answer: C. Sarah observed the mineral had cleavage and was metallic.
Explanation: The answer is C because the question is asking about the difference in their observations. Sarah claimed the mineral had cleavage and was metallic, while Charlie said the opposite.
We greatly appreciate every question and answer you provide. Keep engaging and finding the best solutions. This community is the perfect place to learn and grow together. Your questions deserve reliable answers. Thanks for visiting IDNLearn.com, and see you again soon for more helpful information.
