Join the conversation on IDNLearn.com and get the answers you seek from experts. Our Q&A platform is designed to provide quick and accurate answers to any questions you may have.
Sagot :
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question, I couldn't really tell what the chart looks like, so I am guessing it looks like this:
Sidewalk 1:
x | y
2 | 17
0 | 5
Sidewalk 2:
x | y
1 | 20
3 | 26
Part a.
Now, we have to write the equation for sidewalk 1 in slope-intercept form.
Slope-intercept form is represented as this: [tex]y=mx+b[/tex], where m is the slope and b is the y-intercept. Because this is true for all values on the line, we can plug in values of the chart for Sidewalk 1.
[tex]17=2m+b\\5=0m+b[/tex]
Subtracting the second equation from the first, we have
[tex]12=2m[/tex], and [tex]m = 6[/tex].
Now, we can just plug 6 back into the first equation to get:
[tex]17=2(6)+b[/tex] to get [tex]17 = 12 + b[/tex], and then [tex]b = 5[/tex].
Now, we can just rewrite slope intercept form for Sidewalk 1 to have
[tex]y=6x+5[/tex].
Part b.
Point-slope form is represented as [tex]y-y_1=m(x-x_1)[/tex], where x and y are the coordinates of one point, and x1 and y1 are the coordinates of another point on the line. Because the chart represented for Sidewalk 2 includes a point, namely [tex](1, 20)[/tex] and [tex](3, 26)[/tex], we can plug this in and solve for the slope:
[tex]26-20=m(3-1)[/tex]
This is it in point-slope form. Because the second part of the question asks us to convert to slope-intercept form, we must solve for the slope, or m.
Expanding, we have [tex]26-20=3m-m[/tex]
Combining like terms, we have [tex]6 = 2m[/tex], and then [tex]3 = m[/tex]. Now, we need to plug a point and the slope back into point-slope form, not needing another point. We choose [tex](1, 20)[/tex], even though [tex](3, 26)[/tex] works just as well.
[tex]y-20=3(x-1)[/tex]
Expanding, we have [tex]y-20=3x-3[/tex]
Adding 20 to both sides, we have [tex]y=3x+17[/tex]
Part c. and d.
We see that both equations do not have the same slope, so then they are not parallel, meaning they don't have no solutions. If they have a solution, we can set them equal to each other.
[tex]3x+17=6x+5[/tex]
Subtracting 3x, we have [tex]17=3x+5[/tex]
Subtracting 5, we have [tex]12 = 3x[/tex]
Dividing by 3, we have [tex]x = 4[/tex].
Because there is no x = x, or anything like that, the solution does not have infinite solutions and therefore has one solution, meaning it is consistent independent.
Thank you for using this platform to share and learn. Keep asking and answering. We appreciate every contribution you make. Thank you for choosing IDNLearn.com. We’re dedicated to providing clear answers, so visit us again for more solutions.