Answered

Get detailed and reliable answers to your questions with IDNLearn.com. Get step-by-step guidance for all your technical questions from our dedicated community members.

Use the information from the two sources to answer the question. Source 1: Requiring school districts to recycle will reduce the emissions of greenhouses gases that damage the environment. School districts have many people in them and dispose of large amounts of waste. Their participation is necessary if recycling is going to have an impact on the environment. Source 2: Outside recycling programs can be expensive for schools that need to use their district's money for educational programs and resources. While recycling is important for protecting our planet, getting all students to follow a specific program is not easy and can cause programs to be ineffective. On which fact do the two sources disagree?

Sagot :

Annykslidn

The two sources disagree on the need to create recycling programs for school districts.

We can arrive at this answer because:

  • The two sources presented focus on the issue related to the creation of recycling programs to be applied in school districts.
  • The first source reinforces that these programs will be very beneficial, as school districts produce a lot of waste and that would be positive for nature.
  • The second source agrees that recycling is positive for nature, but disagrees that creating programs for recycling in school districts will be beneficial.

This is because the second source believes that these projects will promote a large expenditure of money that is needed for other activities within the district.

More information:

https://brainly.com/question/15801777?referrer=searchResults

We appreciate every question and answer you provide. Keep engaging and finding the best solutions. This community is the perfect place to learn and grow together. Thank you for trusting IDNLearn.com. We’re dedicated to providing accurate answers, so visit us again for more solutions.