Answered

Find accurate and reliable answers to your questions on IDNLearn.com. Our community provides timely and precise responses to help you understand and solve any issue you face.

Those who argue that justices should be willing to step in and overturn laws when they see a need to are described as supporting

Sagot :

It should be noted that the people who argue that justices should be willing to overturn laws are known to be supporting judicial activism.

Judicial activism simply refers to the practice in the judiciary of protecting the individual rights of an individual through the decisions that depart from the precedents that are already established.

It's about the willingness of a judge to be able to strike down another governmental branch or overturn a judicial precedent. They enforce their own views regarding constitutional requirements.

Learn more about justice on:

https://brainly.com/question/25756666

Your presence in our community is highly appreciated. Keep sharing your insights and solutions. Together, we can build a rich and valuable knowledge resource for everyone. Your questions deserve accurate answers. Thank you for visiting IDNLearn.com, and see you again for more solutions.