IDNLearn.com offers a seamless experience for finding and sharing knowledge. Discover in-depth answers from knowledgeable professionals, providing you with the information you need.
the option with the isoceles triangles can NOT be just of that proof, because nowhere is it defined or proven that there is or are isoceles triangles involved. even though the picture looks like it, but that does not mean anything for the formal proof.
actually, this proof is the same (and is also valid) for non-isoceles triangles.
We appreciate every question and answer you provide. Keep engaging and finding the best solutions. This community is the perfect place to learn and grow together. Thank you for visiting IDNLearn.com. We’re here to provide accurate and reliable answers, so visit us again soon.
