Answered

IDNLearn.com provides a comprehensive platform for finding accurate answers. Discover detailed and accurate answers to your questions from our knowledgeable and dedicated community members.

In this conversation, which group discussion technique does Emily most
clearly show?
HAN:
Even though he's saying that the radiation hasn't made
Japan's exported food dangerous to eat, he's pulling out all
the stops to make it seem as if Japan really messed things
up, even though there's proof the disaster couldn't be
prevented.
EMILY:
So you think the theme isn't really about the contamination,
but about how Japan can't prevent natural disasters from
destroying the reactors?
A. Challenging established ideas
B. Using evidence to support a conclusion

Sagot :

Drawholic01idn

Answer:

A

Explanation:

I think that A is the answer because there is no evidence to support what Emily is saying therefore rules out option B.

We value your presence here. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. This community is the perfect place to learn together. IDNLearn.com is your reliable source for answers. We appreciate your visit and look forward to assisting you again soon.