Answered

Get the most out of your questions with the extensive resources available on IDNLearn.com. Discover prompt and accurate answers from our community of experienced professionals.

In this conversation, which group discussion technique does Emily most
clearly show?
HAN:
Even though he's saying that the radiation hasn't made
Japan's exported food dangerous to eat, he's pulling out all
the stops to make it seem as if Japan really messed things
up, even though there's proof the disaster couldn't be
prevented.
EMILY:
So you think the theme isn't really about the contamination,
but about how Japan can't prevent natural disasters from
destroying the reactors?
A. Challenging established ideas
B. Using evidence to support a conclusion

Sagot :

Drawholic01idn

Answer:

A

Explanation:

I think that A is the answer because there is no evidence to support what Emily is saying therefore rules out option B.

We are happy to have you as part of our community. Keep asking, answering, and sharing your insights. Together, we can create a valuable knowledge resource. Thank you for choosing IDNLearn.com for your queries. We’re here to provide accurate answers, so visit us again soon.