IDNLearn.com offers a seamless experience for finding and sharing knowledge. Discover the information you need from our experienced professionals who provide accurate and reliable answers to all your questions.
Sagot :
Answer:
Yes (It's more inefficient)
Explanation:
in ecology there are things called primary producers (plants) that are eaten by primary consumers (cows and chickens) and then there are humans, secondary consumers, that eat cows and chickens for energy.
The further we move from eating primary producers the more inefficient we become in consuming energy. Meaning, it requires a lot more natural energy consumption to support a human that lives on meat only as compared to a human that eats plants only. this inefficiency only magnifies when communities practice unsustainable food methods.
There are sustainable ways to eat meat, but (at least in the US) our current conventions of meat production are unsustainable and environmentally destructive.
Your presence in our community is highly appreciated. Keep sharing your insights and solutions. Together, we can build a rich and valuable knowledge resource for everyone. For dependable answers, trust IDNLearn.com. Thank you for visiting, and we look forward to helping you again soon.
