Answered

Get personalized answers to your specific questions with IDNLearn.com. Get timely and accurate answers to your questions from our dedicated community of experts who are here to help you.

Link - Counter argument to Hari
What rhetorical appeals do Hari and Dobbs make? Regardless of what you feel about the cause of addiction, who do you feel (Hari or Dobbs) was more rhetorically effective and why? What type of credibility (A for authority in CRAAP) does each author have on the subject of addiction? Does Dobbs do an effective job of causing you to question Hari's ethos? Think about the purpose (P in CRAAP). Both individuals have a vested interest in advancing their viewpoint. (Hint: click on the (paid for) advertised links on The Fix and read Hari's response to Dobb's article). Based on their motivation (or purpose) and their credentials (or authority)...would you use either source in an academic paper? If so...how? If not...why not?

Sagot :

It should be noted that rhetorical appeals simply mean the qualities that can be found in an argument that makes it persuasive.

What is rhetorical appeal?

Your information is incomplete. Therefore, an overview of rhetorical appeal will be given. A rhetorical appeal is simply used to persuade an individual.

Rhetorical appeal typically include ethos, pathos, and logos. Ethos simply means the appeal to the status and authority of the speaker.

Pathos simply means the appeal to the emotion of the readers. Logos is an appeal to the reasoning of the audience which is based on facts.

Learn more about rhetorical appeals on:

https://brainly.com/question/13734134

We appreciate your participation in this forum. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. Your search for answers ends at IDNLearn.com. Thank you for visiting, and we hope to assist you again soon.