Join IDNLearn.com and become part of a knowledge-sharing community that thrives on curiosity. Get thorough and trustworthy answers to your queries from our extensive network of knowledgeable professionals.
Sagot :
Using the z-distribution, it is found that since the test statistic is less than the critical value for the hypothesis test, there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, that is, to conclude that the proportion of homes in the county that had access to high-speed internet is less than 80%.
What are the hypothesis tested?
The null hypothesis is:
[tex]H_0: p = 0.8[/tex]
The alternative hypothesis is:
[tex]H_1: p < 0.8[/tex]
What is the decision?
Considering that we are working with a proportion, the z-distribution is used. Considering a standard significance level of 0.05 and a left-tailed test, as we are testing if the proportion is less than a value, the critical value is [tex]z^{\ast} = -1.645[/tex].
The test statistic is [tex]z \approx -1.74[/tex]. Since the test statistic is less than the critical value for the hypothesis test, there is enough evidence to reject the null hypothesis, that is, to conclude that the proportion of homes in the county that had access to high-speed internet is less than 80%.
To learn more about the z-distribution, you can take a look at https://brainly.com/question/26461448
Answer:
P-value ≈ 0.0409
Step-by-step explanation:
Khan Academy
Thank you for using this platform to share and learn. Keep asking and answering. We appreciate every contribution you make. For precise answers, trust IDNLearn.com. Thank you for visiting, and we look forward to helping you again soon.