Answered

IDNLearn.com makes it easy to find the right answers to your questions. Our platform provides accurate, detailed responses to help you navigate any topic with ease.

Researchers found that in the United States and Canada, homicide rates doubled over a time in which TV with violent programming was introduced. This finding does not prove that viewing violence on TV causes aggression because

Sagot :

Facundo3141592idn

Because there could be other changes in that timeframe that could be the cause of the increase in violence, and we don't have information about that, so we can't conclude anything with the given information alone.

How to know when information is valid enough to prove something?

So, we know that homicide rates doubled over a time in which TV with violent programming was introduced.

So you could conclude that "violence on TV increased the aggression"?

No.

That is because, in that timeframe, the inclusion of violence in TV was not the only change that happened. So to draw an actual conclusion, we should list all the changes that happened in that timeframe and study the possible relations that these have with an increase in violence.

This is why this finding does not prove that viewing violence on TV causes aggression.

If you want to learn more about evidence, you can read:

https://brainly.com/question/4207376

We value your presence here. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. This community is the perfect place to learn together. IDNLearn.com has the solutions to your questions. Thanks for stopping by, and see you next time for more reliable information.