ZimaLeisure0idn
Answered

Explore IDNLearn.com's extensive Q&A database and find the answers you're looking for. Join our community to receive prompt, thorough responses from knowledgeable experts.

Explain the pros and cons of choosing leaders based on their achieved status rather than
their ascribed status.


Sagot :

Jaquelinefvridn

The pros of choosing leaders based on achieved status is choosing based on individual efforts and merits.

The cons, on the other hand, correspond to the high expectations that individuals may have about the leader based on their characteristics.

What is assigned and achieved status?

The ascribed status is a concept that refers to the status that an individual receives at the time of his birth, that is, without reference to his individual qualities.

Achieved status, on the other hand, is related to the individual's skills and achievements acquired through personal effort.

Therefore, choosing a leader based on achieved status can be positive because it is based on innate qualities and proven skills necessary for leadership.

Find out more about achieved status here:

https://brainly.com/question/26412432

We value your participation in this forum. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. Discover insightful answers at IDNLearn.com. We appreciate your visit and look forward to assisting you again.