Rebeckahhernandez98idn
Answered

Discover new perspectives and gain insights with IDNLearn.com. Ask any question and receive timely, accurate responses from our dedicated community of experts.

‼️Brainliest to first correct answer‼️ Which choice best explains the effect of the author's use
of faulty reasoning?
A. The false dilemma diminishes the author's credibility
by failing to present options other than coffee and
peppermint oil.
B. The audience is likely to dismiss the claims because
the author criticizes the use of coffee, which most
people enjoy.
C. The argument distracts from the strong evidence for
peppermint oil because it compares it to coffee, which
is too dissimilar.
D. The non sequitur invites criticism because it connects
coffee's and peppermint oil's effects without showing
an actual correlation.

Brainliest To First Correct Answer Which Choice Best Explains The Effect Of The Authors Use Of Faulty Reasoning A The False Dilemma Diminishes The Authors Credi class=

Sagot :

Kenzi70Beastidn
The answer is c I think
Parrainidn

Based on the author's faulty reasoning, the effect was A. The false dilemma diminishes the author's credibility by failing to present options other than coffee and peppermint oil.

What happened as a result of the author's faulty reasoning?

The author made a false dilemma by comparing coffee with peppermint oil when there are other alternatives that could have been compared.

As a result, the author's credibility will be affect negatively because readers will doubt the other claims made in the text.

Find out more on faulty reasoning at https://brainly.com/question/25748814.

#SPJ2

We are happy to have you as part of our community. Keep asking, answering, and sharing your insights. Together, we can create a valuable knowledge resource. IDNLearn.com is your go-to source for accurate answers. Thanks for stopping by, and come back for more helpful information.