Explore a vast range of topics and get informed answers at IDNLearn.com. Ask your questions and get detailed, reliable answers from our community of knowledgeable experts.

State the conclusion based on the results of the test.
According to the Federal Housing Finance​ Board, the mean price of a​ single-family home two years ago was ​$299,000. A real estate broker believes that because of the recent credit​ crunch, the mean price has increased since then. The null hypothesis is rejected.
Question content area bottom
Part 1
Choose the correct answer below.
A.
There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean price of a​ single-family home has increased from its level two years ago of ​$299,000.
B.
There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean price of a​ single-family home has decreased from its level two years ago of ​$299,000.
C.
There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean price of a​ single-family home has increased from its level two years ago of ​$299,000.
D.
There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean price of a​ single-family home has decreased from its level two years ago of ​$299,000.


Sagot :

The correct option regarding the conclusion of the test hypothesis is given as follows:

C. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the mean price of a​ single-family home has increased from its level two years ago of ​$299,000.

What are the hypothesis tested?

At the null hypothesis, it is tested if the mean price has not increased fro​m $299,000, hence:

[tex]H_0: \mu \leq 299000[/tex]

At the alternative hypothesis, it is tested if it has increased, hence:

[tex]H_1: \mu > 299000[/tex]

The null hypotheses was rejected, which means that there is enough evidence to conclude that the mean price has increased, hence option C is correct.

More can be learned about an hypothesis test at https://brainly.com/question/26454209

#SPJ1