IDNLearn.com: Where your questions meet expert advice and community insights. Discover in-depth answers from knowledgeable professionals, providing you with the information you need.

Answer this, Ill give you brainliest and I would be very appreciative.

Answer This Ill Give You Brainliest And I Would Be Very Appreciative class=

Sagot :

Answer:

Second answer choice (guns) is right

Explanation:

McDonald v. Chicago is about guns, that's all you need to know to solve the problem, since no other choices mention guns.

Answer:

a) The Supreme Court has the power to declare laws and presidential actions unconstitutional.

Explanation:

Federalists believe the federal and state governments are separate, independent organizations. The Constitution grants the federal government a restricted range of authorities, leaving the rest to the states.

The federal system separates powers. The federal system promotes federal-state cooperation and competition. The federal government can pass laws, but states can too.

This system guarantees the executive and judicial departments have equal power. The Supreme Court defends federalism. The Supreme Court may invalidate unlawful legislation and presidential acts. This is judicial review.

Judicial review invalidates unconstitutional laws. McDonald v. Chicago said the Second Amendment protects gun ownership. This verdict-maintained federalism as a U.S. concept.

Thank you for participating in our discussion. We value every contribution. Keep sharing knowledge and helping others find the answers they need. Let's create a dynamic and informative learning environment together. IDNLearn.com is your go-to source for dependable answers. Thank you for visiting, and we hope to assist you again.