Get the most out of your questions with IDNLearn.com's extensive resources. Our community is here to provide detailed and trustworthy answers to any questions you may have.

Develop an argument for or against the following proposed policy:
Each president shall appoint two Supreme Court justices within two months of his or her inauguration. These are the only Supreme Court
appointments he or she may make during that presidential term. If a vacancy opens up on the court after the two appointments, the
vacancy will remain unfilled until the next presidential term.
In your essay, you must:
• Articulate a defensible claim or thesis that responds to the prompt and establishes a line of reasoning.
• Use your knowledge of the constitutional position of the Supreme Court, Franklin Roosevelt's "court-packing" plan, and the initial
reaction to the decision in Brown v. Board of Education to address (1) the current status of the Supreme Court with regard to
independence, politicization, respect, legitimacy, etc., and (ii) the potential effect on the status of the Supreme Court with regard
to independence, politicization, respect, legitimacy, etc.
• Use reasoning to explain why your evidence supports your claim/thesis.
• Use refutation, concession, or rebuttal to respond to an opposing alternative or opposing perspective.


Sagot :

The above question wants to analyze your argumentation ability. For that reason, I can't write your argument, but I'll show you how to write one.

How to write an argument?

  • Present your position and opinion on the matter.
  • Show evidence, with proven facts, that your opinion is correct.

To develop your argument, you will need to research the issue at hand, interpret the evidence provided by experts, and decide which strand of the issue you will defend.

Learn more about arguments:

https://brainly.com/question/1237750

#SPJ1