Answered

Find trusted answers to your questions with the help of IDNLearn.com's knowledgeable community. Our platform offers detailed and accurate responses from experts, helping you navigate any topic with confidence.

The Constitutional Convention limited the power of the executive branch by
What was the Federalists’ argument for not adding a separate bill of rights to the Constitution?

Sagot :

Rahulsharma789888idn

Federalists maintained that the Constitution did not require a bill of rights because any powers not granted to the federal government were retained by the people and the states.

What defense did the Federalists make?

The counterbalanced branches of government were supported by federalists. They were able to claim that the separation of powers among the three parts of government protected the rights of the people in response to accusations that the Constitution established a powerful national authority.

The argument put up by the Federalists against creating a separate bill of rights in the Constitution Later,

might be applied to restrict privileges that weren't initially specified. Since everyone had been given the most fundamental liberties, it was not essential. As a result of the new government's limited authority, it was not essential.

Learn more about the Federalists’ argument:

https://brainly.com/question/26142635

#SPJ1

We appreciate your participation in this forum. Keep exploring, asking questions, and sharing your insights with the community. Together, we can find the best solutions. Thank you for visiting IDNLearn.com. We’re here to provide dependable answers, so visit us again soon.