IDNLearn.com offers a comprehensive platform for finding and sharing knowledge. Join our interactive Q&A platform to receive prompt and accurate responses from experienced professionals in various fields.
A man is arrested for a crime. At the police station, police question him, and he confesses. His lawyer later argues that the police should have informed the man he had the right to ask for a lawyer before speaking. The Supreme Court rules that the man, and others suspected of a crime, must be informed of their constitutional rights when they are arrested.
Which Supreme Court case does this summary describe?
A.
In re Gault
B.
Gideon v. Wainwright
C.
Tinker v. Des Moines
D.
Miranda v. Arizona
Thank you for contributing to our discussion. Don't forget to check back for new answers. Keep asking, answering, and sharing useful information. Thank you for visiting IDNLearn.com. We’re here to provide clear and concise answers, so visit us again soon.
