Answered

IDNLearn.com: Where your questions meet expert answers and community support. Ask your questions and receive reliable, detailed answers from our dedicated community of experts.

Do you think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted? Or do you think a lesser burden of proof, like the preponderance of evidence in needed in civil cases, is more appropriate?

Sagot :

Adefioyelaoyeidn

I think defendants should have to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted is more appropriate.

Who is a Defendant?

This is referred to as the individual or group which have been accused of breaking the law and is being tried in court.

It is more appropriate for the defendants to be found guilty beyond a reasonable doubt to be convicted because the jury will employ  the use of evidences and testimonies in other to give a verdict. This ensures fair judgement and prevent innocent from being punished unjustly.

Read more about Defendant here https://brainly.com/question/7315287

#SPJ1

We appreciate your contributions to this forum. Don't forget to check back for the latest answers. Keep asking, answering, and sharing useful information. Accurate answers are just a click away at IDNLearn.com. Thanks for stopping by, and come back for more reliable solutions.